While death is never a joke to those who suffer the loss of a loved one, for some time now estate planning professionals have been quick to quip that if you have a rich relative, 2010 would be the most convenient year for them to check out. With no Federal estate tax in 2010, wealthy folks stand to save their families more than 50 cents on the dollar by being gracious enough to pass on this year instead of waiting until 2011 when the tax returns full force.
The New York Times ran a story yesterday that clearly demonstrates this morbid fact. It is the story of Texas tycoon Dan Duncan who passed away a couple months back at the age of 77. Mr. Duncan was worth an estimated $9 billion, making him one of the richest men in the world. He left much of this fortune to his children and grandchildren. Had Mr. Duncan died in 2009, or in 2011, his family would have faced an estate tax bill in the billions of dollars. Instead, through the sheer happenstance of his dying in 2010, Mr. Duncan’s heirs did not have to pay not a single penny of federal estate taxes!
Somewhere in Washington DC an IRS big wig is shedding a tear at this lost “opportunity.”
The future of the federal estate tax is uncertain, but as 2010 drags on and we draw closer to election season, my expectation of Congressional action dwindles. I am starting to believe we may not see any of the “corrective” legislation that has been promised since mid 2009, and that we should expect the old estate tax laws to resurrect on January 1, 2011. At that point it won’t be just the billionaires who will be affected. The personal exemption amount will drop to $1 million per person and the tax rates will climb to a top rate of 55%.
Have you reviewed your Wills, trusts and estate plan to ensure you and your family will be ready for the coming change? Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Finally, let me say that my thoughts and prayers go out to the family of Mr. Duncan. Their loss, and his worth as a man, a father, and a husband, no doubt far exceed any amount of money.
All the best,
Joe Donlon
The estate planning law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC provides high quality, focused legal counsel to clients all ages and wealth levels in the following areas:
Wills & Trusts
Asset Protection Planning
Estate Tax Planning
Elder Law
Special Needs Trusts
Probate & Estate Administration
Donlon & Associates, PC serves clients throughout New York City and Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Staten Island.
Monday, June 14, 2010
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Critical Factors to Consider When Leaving an Inheritance to Children or Grandchildren
Although plenty of people understand the importance of leaving an inheritance to their children or grandchildren, few have procedures in place to ensure proper money management. The benefit of planning is that it helps you maximize the assets your loved ones receive when you can’t provide for them.
Below are several financial factors you must consider when leaving an economic legacy.
First, all assets left to a minor must be held by a guardian or placed in a trust because minors can’t legally hold and manage inherited money. While directing that your money will be held by your child’s guardian seems intuitive, it can actually cause many problems. Assets held by guardians are subject to strict and burdensome court supervision. As a result, expensive legal fees and time-consuming court procedures can make it difficult for the guardian access the money and use it for the benefit of your child or grandchild when they need it.
What about your life insurance or retirement accounts? Unfortunately, directly naming a minor as beneficiary of these assets is risky. The insurance company or brokerage house could hold the assets until the child turns 18 and then turn it over to the child directly. Many companies won’t even release funds to a surviving parent for safekeeping and management without a time-consuming and expensive court decree.
One alternative is an UTMA (Uniform Transfers to Minors Act) account. Controlled by state law, these accounts hold money given to minors. The account is legally owned by the minor (it even includes his/her Social Security number) but the management and access is controlled by the custodian you choose until the child turns 21 – or other age specified by state law.
The UTMA account is a great vehicle, but it raises an important question: Do you believe in your child or grandchild’s ability to manage a large sum of cash at 21? Will that money go to college tuition or a Ferrari and a month in Las Vegas?
If you prefer having your funds held until your child or grandchild is well into adulthood, then an “inheritance trust” is a smart option. A trust allows you to control the use and distribution of your assets after you’re gone. You choose a trustee (who can be a friend, family member, advisor or financial institution) who will oversee the funds and use them for your child or grandchild’s health, education and support. Assets held in the trust are protected from poor spending habits, lawsuits, creditors and divorce. The trust funds will be turned over to your child or grandchild directly at the age your designate, which could be 25 or 30, or even later.
Of course, you can navigate the tricky and often obscure laws of asset protection with competent legal advice. You’ll get a clear understanding of your choices, so you don’t risk creating financial struggles, unnecessary taxes and strained family relations.
Joseph P. Donlon is a New York estate planning attorney and the founder of Donlon & Associates, PC. He is a frequent lecturer on estate planning topics and is routinely invited to speak before financial institutions, civic groups and business gatherings. Get more of his free tips and insider information about how to protect your family, reduce estate taxes and safeguard your assets at http://www.donlonlaw.com.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs) - an endangered species?
Talk of limiting short term GRATs has been around for a while now, but the discussion seemed to be “back burnered” with the 2010 Estate Tax repeal actually coming into effect, and no signs of life in Congress regarding any Estate Tax reform this year. Well, that seems to have changed with the passing of HR 4849 in the House on 3/24.
Traditionally estate planners use GRATs that last 2 or 3 years to minimize mortality risk (i.e. the chance the grantor dies during the term thereby causing full estate inclusion and defeating the GRATs purpose) and that are “zeroed out” to avoid any gift tax on the transaction (i.e. the remainder interest is calculated to be worth $0 under IRS formulas even though the grantor and his advisors plan for the assets in the GRAT to appreciate significantly and thus have a large actual remainder value).
The House bill would severely curtail the use of low risk GRATs by requiring a minimum 10 year term and a remainder value greater the zero. The latter requirement doesn’t seem too onerous since no specific value is required and smart estate attorneys tend to report a remainder value of ~$1 on the client’s Gift Tax return to start the Statute of Limitations running. The 10 year term, though, would be a much bigger issue. While longer term GRATs actually transfer more value to the remaindermen, the previously mentioned mortality risk is always a concern.
What might this mean? Well, for one thing, sales to irrevocable grantor trusts (“IDGT”) look more attractive. These transactions are traditionally structured for 9 year terms (but can be longer or shorter) and use more favorable interest rates than GRATs. They have far less mortality risk since the technique “freezes” the estate tax value of the transferred asset so if the grantor dies in year 5, only part of the value of the asset is pulled back into his estate, and such value would not include any appreciation on that asset during those five years. Had the grantor died during year 5 of a 10 year GRAT, the entire value (including appreciation) would be pulled back into his estate. Another advantage for Sales to IDGTs is the ability to allocate GST exemption, something not permitted for GRATs – thus making them preferred tools for multi-generational transfers and Dynasty Trust creation.
Sales to IDGTs do have one significant danger: valuation risk. Much like a GRAT, when implementing an IDGT sale, one must value the transferred assets and often will take discounts on that value for various reasons. If the IRS later challenges those values and discounts, the effect can be significant. In a GRAT, a changed value has no effect since most GRATs are drafted using percentage payouts as opposed to fixed dollars amounts. If an asset value changes, this language “captures” it and no adverse effects occur. In contrast, IDGT sales use specific dollar amounts in their provisions which means a change in asset value after the terms are set could cause the transaction to be treated as a part sale / part gift and trigger gift taxes. Furthermore, if GST exemption had been previously allocated, a new asset value might cause the Inclusion Ratio for the IDGT to change, causing a whole host of problems. (New rulings on so called “defined value clauses” can be applied to IDGTs to reduce these risks. Such a discussion is well beyond the scope of this post though)
Of course, all of this discussion may be premature – the Senate still needs to vote on the Bill and the President needs to sign it. However, given the fact these anti-GRAT provisions are specifically designated as ”revenue raisers” for the Jobs Bill, I suspect the likelihood they will be implemented is be better than 50/50.
The current low interest rates and a rebounding economy that is causing assets to appreciate and business to start picking up means we are in a perfect environment for GRATs. If you (or a client, if you are an advisor) are on the verge of a liquidity event (e.g. business sale, IPO, etc) or have assets that are depressed in the current market but are expected to rapidly appreciate in the coming couple of years, now is the time to get moving - there is no way to know how long this window will remain open.
As always, please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or we can be a resource to you in any way.
All the best,
Joe Donlon
The estate planning law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC provides high quality, focused legal counsel to clients all ages and wealth levels in the following areas:
Wills & Trusts
Asset Protection Planning
Advanced Planning for Business Owners & Professionals
Elder Law
Special Needs Trusts
Probate & Estate Administration
Donlon & Associates, PC provides trusts & estates and asset protection services to clients throughout New York City and Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Staten Island.
Traditionally estate planners use GRATs that last 2 or 3 years to minimize mortality risk (i.e. the chance the grantor dies during the term thereby causing full estate inclusion and defeating the GRATs purpose) and that are “zeroed out” to avoid any gift tax on the transaction (i.e. the remainder interest is calculated to be worth $0 under IRS formulas even though the grantor and his advisors plan for the assets in the GRAT to appreciate significantly and thus have a large actual remainder value).
The House bill would severely curtail the use of low risk GRATs by requiring a minimum 10 year term and a remainder value greater the zero. The latter requirement doesn’t seem too onerous since no specific value is required and smart estate attorneys tend to report a remainder value of ~$1 on the client’s Gift Tax return to start the Statute of Limitations running. The 10 year term, though, would be a much bigger issue. While longer term GRATs actually transfer more value to the remaindermen, the previously mentioned mortality risk is always a concern.
What might this mean? Well, for one thing, sales to irrevocable grantor trusts (“IDGT”) look more attractive. These transactions are traditionally structured for 9 year terms (but can be longer or shorter) and use more favorable interest rates than GRATs. They have far less mortality risk since the technique “freezes” the estate tax value of the transferred asset so if the grantor dies in year 5, only part of the value of the asset is pulled back into his estate, and such value would not include any appreciation on that asset during those five years. Had the grantor died during year 5 of a 10 year GRAT, the entire value (including appreciation) would be pulled back into his estate. Another advantage for Sales to IDGTs is the ability to allocate GST exemption, something not permitted for GRATs – thus making them preferred tools for multi-generational transfers and Dynasty Trust creation.
Sales to IDGTs do have one significant danger: valuation risk. Much like a GRAT, when implementing an IDGT sale, one must value the transferred assets and often will take discounts on that value for various reasons. If the IRS later challenges those values and discounts, the effect can be significant. In a GRAT, a changed value has no effect since most GRATs are drafted using percentage payouts as opposed to fixed dollars amounts. If an asset value changes, this language “captures” it and no adverse effects occur. In contrast, IDGT sales use specific dollar amounts in their provisions which means a change in asset value after the terms are set could cause the transaction to be treated as a part sale / part gift and trigger gift taxes. Furthermore, if GST exemption had been previously allocated, a new asset value might cause the Inclusion Ratio for the IDGT to change, causing a whole host of problems. (New rulings on so called “defined value clauses” can be applied to IDGTs to reduce these risks. Such a discussion is well beyond the scope of this post though)
Of course, all of this discussion may be premature – the Senate still needs to vote on the Bill and the President needs to sign it. However, given the fact these anti-GRAT provisions are specifically designated as ”revenue raisers” for the Jobs Bill, I suspect the likelihood they will be implemented is be better than 50/50.
The current low interest rates and a rebounding economy that is causing assets to appreciate and business to start picking up means we are in a perfect environment for GRATs. If you (or a client, if you are an advisor) are on the verge of a liquidity event (e.g. business sale, IPO, etc) or have assets that are depressed in the current market but are expected to rapidly appreciate in the coming couple of years, now is the time to get moving - there is no way to know how long this window will remain open.
As always, please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or we can be a resource to you in any way.
All the best,
Joe Donlon
The estate planning law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC provides high quality, focused legal counsel to clients all ages and wealth levels in the following areas:
Wills & Trusts
Asset Protection Planning
Advanced Planning for Business Owners & Professionals
Elder Law
Special Needs Trusts
Probate & Estate Administration
Donlon & Associates, PC provides trusts & estates and asset protection services to clients throughout New York City and Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Staten Island.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
New York Elder Law & Medicaid Planning News
The Regional Rates for 2010 are:
Long Island: $11,227
NYC (5 Boroughs): $10,285
The Regional Rates are used to determine the length of Medicaid ineligibility caused by an uncompensated transfer of assets from the applicant (or spouse) during the so called "look back period." The "look back period" currently includes any transfers made from February 2006 onward.
You can find the 2010 Resource (asset) Allowance and Income limits in my December 1st, 2009 post, below.
Please don't hesitate to contact us for more information.
The New York law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC focuses exclusively on:
Estate Planning
Elder Law
Asset Protection Planning
Family Business Planning
Donlon & Associates, PC
www.donlonlaw.com
Long Island: $11,227
NYC (5 Boroughs): $10,285
The Regional Rates are used to determine the length of Medicaid ineligibility caused by an uncompensated transfer of assets from the applicant (or spouse) during the so called "look back period." The "look back period" currently includes any transfers made from February 2006 onward.
You can find the 2010 Resource (asset) Allowance and Income limits in my December 1st, 2009 post, below.
Please don't hesitate to contact us for more information.
The New York law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC focuses exclusively on:
Estate Planning
Elder Law
Asset Protection Planning
Family Business Planning
Donlon & Associates, PC
www.donlonlaw.com
Thursday, January 7, 2010
The State of Estate Taxation in 2010
Well, January 1 has come and gone and Congress has taken no action regarding the federal transfer tax system (estate & gifts taxes). What does this mean? As of 01/01/2010, the major rules are as follows:
What will happen now?
No one can predict what Congress will do, but there have been assurances from important figures that estate tax reform is high on the agenda, and the intention is to pass such legislation and make it retroactive to January 2010. Many commentators question whether such a move would be constitutional. Either way, you can be sure we'll have years of lawsuits to look forward to on this one.
I invite you to contact me directly with any questions or concerns you might have. The new laws, regardless of how short lived they might be, provide significant tax saving opportunities for many people. At a minimum it is highly recommended that you review any documents and plans you currently have in place to ensure they will achieve the desired results for your family in this greatly altered and highly unpredictable environment. As a dedicated estate planning law firm, Donlon & Associates continues to provide our current and prospective clients with the highest quality tax advice and legal counsel in this field.
Joseph Donlon, Esq.
- There is no Estate Tax
- There is no Generation Skipping Transfer Tax (GST)
- The Gift Tax remains in effect, although the tax rate drops to 35%. The annual exclusion for 2010 is $13,000, and the lifetime exemption remains unchanged ($1,000,000).
- The "Stepped Up Basis" rule has been eliminated except for two situations:
- The first $1.3 million of built in gains (total) transferred to non-spouse beneficiaries and
- The first $3.0 million of built in gains transferred to a spouse
What will happen now?
No one can predict what Congress will do, but there have been assurances from important figures that estate tax reform is high on the agenda, and the intention is to pass such legislation and make it retroactive to January 2010. Many commentators question whether such a move would be constitutional. Either way, you can be sure we'll have years of lawsuits to look forward to on this one.
I invite you to contact me directly with any questions or concerns you might have. The new laws, regardless of how short lived they might be, provide significant tax saving opportunities for many people. At a minimum it is highly recommended that you review any documents and plans you currently have in place to ensure they will achieve the desired results for your family in this greatly altered and highly unpredictable environment. As a dedicated estate planning law firm, Donlon & Associates continues to provide our current and prospective clients with the highest quality tax advice and legal counsel in this field.
Joseph Donlon, Esq.
Friday, December 18, 2009
Estate Tax Changes for 2010
As I write this there are only 14 days left in 2009 and Congress has yet to take action to prevent the massive changes in the estate and gift tax laws that are to take effect on January 1st, 2010. The two biggest changes will be the elimination of the federal estate tax altogether, and its replacement with a new income tax framework which would eliminate the so called "stepped up basis" rule and implement a "carryover basis" scheme.
The radical changes in the tax law will makes things difficult for professional advisors and their clients for a while as everyone learns the new rules, discards old planing tools, and reorients themselves. Unfortunately, without Congressional intervention, such difficulties will be compounded just one year later (Jan. 2011) when the laws change again and the estate tax returns in full force and the "carryover basis" scheme goes away. To add insult to injury, the renewed estate tax will be higher (up to 60% vs. 45% today) and the personal exemption amount will drop significantly (to $1 million from $3.5 million today)!
There is some small hope though. As of December 3rd, the House has passed a bill extending the current estate tax regime ($3.5 mill exemption, 45% rate, stepped up basis rule) permanently. Unfortuantely, the Senate seems too locked in the Health Care Debate to pay much attention.
So what are estate tax experts doing? We're working hard to prepare ourselves and our clients for the worst. Regardless of what happens, you can rest assured that those of us dedicated to this practice will be ready to provide the highest quality advice and counsel. As always, we will ensure our clients save taxes, protect their families and safeguard their assets.
If you have any questions about estate tax planning, please don't hesitate to call me (Joseph P Donlon, Esq.), or visit our website at www.donlonlaw.com.
The radical changes in the tax law will makes things difficult for professional advisors and their clients for a while as everyone learns the new rules, discards old planing tools, and reorients themselves. Unfortunately, without Congressional intervention, such difficulties will be compounded just one year later (Jan. 2011) when the laws change again and the estate tax returns in full force and the "carryover basis" scheme goes away. To add insult to injury, the renewed estate tax will be higher (up to 60% vs. 45% today) and the personal exemption amount will drop significantly (to $1 million from $3.5 million today)!
There is some small hope though. As of December 3rd, the House has passed a bill extending the current estate tax regime ($3.5 mill exemption, 45% rate, stepped up basis rule) permanently. Unfortuantely, the Senate seems too locked in the Health Care Debate to pay much attention.
So what are estate tax experts doing? We're working hard to prepare ourselves and our clients for the worst. Regardless of what happens, you can rest assured that those of us dedicated to this practice will be ready to provide the highest quality advice and counsel. As always, we will ensure our clients save taxes, protect their families and safeguard their assets.
If you have any questions about estate tax planning, please don't hesitate to call me (Joseph P Donlon, Esq.), or visit our website at www.donlonlaw.com.
Friday, December 11, 2009
2010 New York State Medicaid Resource & Income Allowances
NURSING HOME CARE
Applicant Community Spouse
Resource Allowance: $ 13,800 $ 109,560 (maximum)
Income Allowance: $ 50/month $ 2,739/month
HOME CARE
Applicant Community Spouse
Resource Allowance: $ 13,800 $ 20,100
Income Allowance: $ 767/month $ 1,117/month
The New York law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC focuses exclusively on:
Estate Planning
Elder Law
Asset Protection Planning
Family Business Planning
Donlon & Associates, PC
www.donlonlaw.com
Applicant Community Spouse
Resource Allowance: $ 13,800 $ 109,560 (maximum)
Income Allowance: $ 50/month $ 2,739/month
HOME CARE
Applicant Community Spouse
Resource Allowance: $ 13,800 $ 20,100
Income Allowance: $ 767/month $ 1,117/month
The New York law firm of Donlon & Associates, PC focuses exclusively on:
Estate Planning
Elder Law
Asset Protection Planning
Family Business Planning
Donlon & Associates, PC
www.donlonlaw.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)